Micro Lenders

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 12 April 2012

I Knew It: 61% of Treasuries Purchased by the Fed

Posted on 01:08 by Unknown
What do you get when you cross the soppy Bushite Lee Greenwood with Obama's pastor? For one thing, you get a more accurate (financial) portrayal of the current state of that benighted land:

I'm cowed to be an American
Where at last I know I'm unfree
And I won't forget Uncle Ben
Who sold me into debt slavery

You can modify the rest of the lyrics accordingly--especially with Jeremiah Wright's trademark catchphrase replacing the title of the Greenwood tune. Anyway, this lyrical reassessment was brought about by a TIME feature I read recently that revealed the lie behind the "deficit's don't matter because US borrowing rates are so low" favoured by assorted (and rather ignorant) USA #1-style cheerleaders who inhabit the blogosphere.

As it turns out, the Federal Reserve flow of funds report for the entire year of 2011 reveals how "strong" demand is in the "market" for US treasuries. With 61% of Treasury purchases accounted for by Federal Reserve buying, both terms in quotation marks are cast in doubt. Yes, we know that open market purchases of treasuries are the result of policy decisions. But no, we did not know the cumulative extent of these purchases viewed in annual terms.

The proper analogy is one I made before: It's like calling your kid a "great salesman" after setting up a lemonade stand....only for the rest to find out that nearly two-thirds of all his "sales" came from you. So it is when monetary authorities justify currently bedraggled  American finances via some variation on the "deficits don't matter because US borrowing rates are so low."

The questions I would like to see answered are following:

(1) If demand from foreigners for Treasuries is so great anyway since the US is providing a "safe haven" through "liquidity services," why is there a need for another arm of government to undertake such large-scale purchases? Why make the state do what the market would do by itself?

(2) Related to (1), there is also a concern about bloating the balance sheet of the Fed. Why needlessly do so if others would willingly lap up these securities?

(3)  Lastly, would rates be this low if the Bernanke Fed deemed it unnecessary to make purchases on this scale?

The upshot is that they are intervening so heavily because they know the market, left to its devices, will not likely depress Treasury yields to a similar extent. The market-clearing price is, in all likelihood, significantly higher. The unprecedented expansion of public debt is thus matched by the unprecedented gaming of the market for these securities. The corollary to unparalleled indebtedness is unparalleled subvention of market forces. There's no need for Obama's pastor to damn America in speech when you have monetary authorities doing so in deed. The latter is certainly worse.

I guess the joke's on you, factually challenged America #1 cheerleaders, for nobody's quite as interested in your dollar-denominated detritus than yourselves. On my part and the rest of us who don't support your folly, you're more than welcome to it.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Americana, Cheneynomics | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Commercialism & Christmas in Non-Christian Societies
    Thailand features Christmas elephants, f'rinstance Your Asian correspondent--obviously Catholic with a name like "Emmanuel"--h...
  • IMF's (Shocking?) Endorsement of Procyclicality
    I needn't recycle criticisms you're most familiar with concerning how the IMF exacerbates difficulties by deterring poor countries f...
  • Today's Resource Curse on Aussie Surfboard Mfg
    Little surfer, little one, make my heart come all undone...with your"Made in China" surfboard? Is there nothing sacred about beach...
  • Shariah Banking: Islamic Financial Services Board
    The Commonwealth news outlet Global Briefing has an interesting interview with Jaseem Ahmed, secretary-general of the Islamic Financial Se...
  • United States vs S&P: Sovereign Ratings Next?
    It is with great interest that I am following the ongoing civil suit by the United States against the rating agency Standard and Poor's...
  • Need More Proof Patent Systems Favour the West?
    It's sad but true that the more you know about our world, the more disillusioned you become. However, in the name of normative inquiry, ...
  • Meet China's Real Challenger, Mexico (No Kidding)
    Military man-turned-president Porfirio Diaz is usually attributed with saying, "Poor Mexico--so near the United States, so far from hea...
  • Without You: Contemplating the UK-Free EU
    Rest assured that it's not only the Chinese who have a habit of disowning Nobel laureates. For the longest time, the British have shown...
  • Central Banks and Gold: Buy High, Sell Low
    Despite strides made by central banks worldwide in recent years to control inflation, they are hardly infallible. Take the case of gold: Wit...
  • Susan Rice, the New Archetypal Ugly American
    Although years and years of economic stagnation have thinned their numbers somewhat, Ugly Americans are still rather plentiful--including po...

Categories

  • Africa
  • Agriculture
  • Americana
  • Anti-Globalization
  • APEC
  • Bretton Woods Twins
  • Caribbean
  • Casino Capitalism
  • Cheneynomics
  • China
  • Commodities
  • Credit Crisis
  • CSR
  • Culture
  • Currencies
  • Demography
  • Development
  • ds Twins
  • Economic Diplomacy
  • Economic History
  • Education
  • Egypt
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • FDI
  • Gender Equality
  • Governance
  • Health
  • Hegemony
  • IMF
  • India
  • Innovation
  • Internet Governance
  • Japan
  • Labor
  • Latin America
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Microfinance
  • Middle East
  • Migration
  • Mining
  • MNCs
  • Neoliberalism
  • Nonsense
  • Religion
  • Russia
  • Security
  • Service Announcement
  • Socialism
  • Soft Power
  • South Asia
  • South Korea
  • Southeast Asia
  • Sports
  • Supply Chain
  • Trade
  • Travel
  • Underground Economy
  • United Nations
  • World Bank

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (183)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2012 (242)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ▼  April (16)
      • Globalizing Bad Taste in Cars, BRICS+Beckham Edn
      • Bad Habits Die Hard: On USAID "Relaxing" Tied Aid
      • 6/365 Egyptian Lawmakers Vote for IMF Rescue
      • Fight-a-Bully: Philippine, PRC Territorial Disputes
      • Why LDCs Won't Give the IMF More Money
      • IMF's (Shocking?) Endorsement of Procyclicality
      • Lingo Wars: Urban Dictionary v Academie Francaise
      • EuroPissants: Should Germany [!] Leave Eurozone?
      • Pope 1, Obama 0: LatAm United vs Cuba Embargo
      • I Knew It: 61% of Treasuries Purchased by the Fed
      • Developmental Authoritarianism: Burma's Turn?
      • EuroNasty II: Carbon Taxes on Maritime Transport?
      • Palace Coup? World Bank Vets Pick Okonjo-Iweala
      • A Parisian in America: Comic Stylings of IMF's Lag...
      • Got Fission? Debating Nukes 4 Development
      • Money Talks? Bahrain GP Still On (Fortnight to Go)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ►  2011 (75)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile