Micro Lenders

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 12 December 2011

CSR in Iran? My Way or the Huawei (Router Mfg)

Posted on 02:52 by Unknown
There's an interesting article in the WSJ on the recent pullback of Chinese router manufacturer Huawei from doing business with Iran. Given the perceived willingness of Chinese firms to go where Western MNCs dare not roam due to limitations on investing in certain bogey nations alike (yes) Iran, Myanmar and North Korea, this occurrence is eye-opening at the very least. That is, are even Chinese corporations (with government ties, no less) subject to international pressure regarding Iran's alleged nuclear programme, human rights abuses and so forth?
Chinese telecommunications- equipment maker Huawei Technologies Co. said it will scale back its business in Iran, where the company provides services to government-controlled telecom operators, following reports that Iranian police were using mobile-network technology to track down and arrest dissidents.

Shenzhen-based Huawei will "voluntarily restrict its business development there by no longer seeking new customers and limiting its business activities with existing customers," according to a statement Friday on the company's website. It said the company was making the move due to the "increasingly complex situation in Iran." Company spokesmen declined to elaborate.

The action follows a front-page Wall Street Journal article in October that documented how Huawei's business grew in Iran following a pullback by Western companies after the government's bloody crackdown on its citizens two years ago. Iranian human-rights groups outside Iran say there are dozens of documented cases in which dissidents were traced and arrested through the government's ability to track the location of their cellphones—technology for which Huawei has provided support.

Activists hailed the company's decision, noting it was the first time a major Chinese company had decided to scale back its business in Iran. Until now, Iran has viewed its partnership with Chinese companies as a solid alternative to Western contracts.

"This is a significant milestone," said Mark Wallace, president of United Against Nuclear Iran and a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. "For the first time a major Chinese business is pulling back from Iran in the face of mounting international scorn for Iran's brutal regime." The New York-based group had been pressuring Huawei to leave Iran and had been communicating privately with the company for several weeks.

A spokesman for the U.S. State Department said it welcomed Huawei's announcement, adding that the U.S. "calls on all firms to exercise vigilance when doing business with Iran and ensure that any business does not contribute to the Government of Iran's ability to repress its own people."
That's all very well and good, but did the bleeding hearts brigade really persuade Huawei to curtail its activities selling routers to Iran that could help their government identify particularly vocal denizens--or is something else? Well, the article goes on to strongly suggest the latter possibility:
Executives at Huawei's highest levels have been discussing for months whether to scale back in Iran, according to people familiar with the matter. Those discussions gained in intensity in recent weeks, particularly after the Journal article, several people said...

Some Huawei executives in Shenzhen see operations in Iran as jeopardizing expansion opportunities in the U.S. and Europe, where the Chinese company has faced skepticism over its compliance procedures and dealings with countries that have pariah regimes. That was a driving factor behind the decision to dial back operations in Iran, a person familiar with the matter said. The Chinese company has held talks with consultants, lawyers and lobbyists from the U.S. on the issue.
Huawei is probably dialling back operations after finding out that Iran is not as lucrative an opportunity as once thought--or is already an exhausted one. As Jessie J sang, the Chinese don't need so much Iranian (money, money) at this point in time. There's also the matter of Huawei trying to establish a better reputation for itself independent of PRC state policy to consider and all of that protectionist "security"-related BS. Insofar as Huawei perceives US and European markets as being larger opportunities than doing business with Iran, well, let the human rights activists think they're having their "way."

I for one don't buy this story--though I have no qualms about using Huawei's routers instead of Cisco's and saving money in the process.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in CSR, Middle East, Security | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Today's Resource Curse on Aussie Surfboard Mfg
    Little surfer, little one, make my heart come all undone...with your"Made in China" surfboard? Is there nothing sacred about beach...
  • Yay! Our LSE IDEAS, World's 4th Best Uni Thinktank
    Well here's a nice bit of news concerning LSE IDEAS , the research centre I am associated with. The good folks at the University of Penn...
  • Globocop No More: United States After Unipolarity
    LSE IDEAS has been churning out special reports at such a furious pace that I almost forgot to mention this one concerning The United State...
  • Fake Diploma? Be Ecuador's Next CenBank Chief!
    Ah, Ecuador...the archetypal banana republic. For a country that supposedly loathes the United States via its leader Rafael Correa and his a...
  • Commercialism & Christmas in Non-Christian Societies
    Thailand features Christmas elephants, f'rinstance Your Asian correspondent--obviously Catholic with a name like "Emmanuel"--h...
  • Egypt and the Elusive Interest-Free IMF Loan
    Back in the 80s, I loved Aldo Nova's one-hit wonder " Fantasy ." Instead of treating it as a catchy tune and nothing more, I...
  • How Scuderia Ferrari Improved a Hospital ICU [!]
    Longtime readers will know from my blog FAQs that I am most excited about the field of IPE borrowing from different social science discipli...
  • Lamborghini Aventador, US-Subsidized Supercar
    Now for one of my occasional Robb Report impersonations--albeit with an IPE twist. (We've got style, baby.) In 1998, Lamborghini becam...
  • Patrice Lumumba Friendship University Revisited
    Younger readers probably don't know what the USSR's Patrice Lumumba Friendship University was, so a short introduction is required. ...
  • The Myth of the Inflexible Chinese Communist Party
    Some of you may be familiar with the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) that was created by the American congress in 2...

Categories

  • Africa
  • Agriculture
  • Americana
  • Anti-Globalization
  • APEC
  • Bretton Woods Twins
  • Caribbean
  • Casino Capitalism
  • Cheneynomics
  • China
  • Commodities
  • Credit Crisis
  • CSR
  • Culture
  • Currencies
  • Demography
  • Development
  • ds Twins
  • Economic Diplomacy
  • Economic History
  • Education
  • Egypt
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • FDI
  • Gender Equality
  • Governance
  • Health
  • Hegemony
  • IMF
  • India
  • Innovation
  • Internet Governance
  • Japan
  • Labor
  • Latin America
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Microfinance
  • Middle East
  • Migration
  • Mining
  • MNCs
  • Neoliberalism
  • Nonsense
  • Religion
  • Russia
  • Security
  • Service Announcement
  • Socialism
  • Soft Power
  • South Asia
  • South Korea
  • Southeast Asia
  • Sports
  • Supply Chain
  • Trade
  • Travel
  • Underground Economy
  • United Nations
  • World Bank

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (183)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2012 (242)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ▼  2011 (75)
    • ▼  December (23)
      • BlackBerry's Latest Banishment Threat - Indonesia
      • Singapore's Fat-Fighting Tool: Military Conscription
      • Like Japan's, I Wish My Gov't Held RMB Bonds
      • 2012 EU Carbon Tax on Airlines: US, China Whine
      • Bid the EUR Adieu, Re-Enter PTE, ITL, GRD, ESP?
      • Your Top Migration Stories of 2011
      • Filipino Migrant Workers & Middle East Crossfire
      • 'Nature's Banker' on Proper Environment Valuation
      • Game Over, America: RMB Eclipses $ by 2021
      • Manifold Destiny: PRC Slaps Tariffs On US Autos
      • Holy Guacamole, Russia Finally Joins WTO Today!
      • Hey Saint Jude: The Lost Cause of the UK in the EU
      • Indian Retail: Mom & Pop 1, Wal-Mart 0
      • CSR in Iran? My Way or the Huawei (Router Mfg)
      • Multilateralism Ain't Dead: A Climate Deal in Durban
      • Obama, Bushite Climate Obstructionist or Hero?
      • 'China's Reserves Have Fallen 3 Months In a Row'
      • Yes, the Main Beneficiary of the Euro Was...the UK
      • Chicago Merc Now Takes RMB for Futures Trading
      • Adios Gringos: CELAC, the US-Less Americas PTA
      • Don't Count on China Using Reserves for 'Rescue'
      • Should US Borrow More Given Treasury 'Demand'?
      • Doomsters' Disagreement: Faber, Rogers on PRC
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile